Abridged Version of the original story
1
By nud831
This is actually an abridged version. Using the term βremastered β is really a distinction without a difference.
Love Sherlock Holmes
5
By YT_ZC9GangGangX1
Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Very Good
A disgrace to the author and the novel
1
By The Rhythmist
As the other reviewer "Mr. Silvers" pointed out, this shameful "remastered" version of the book uses censorship and also removed a lot of the original content. This is NOT what remastering is about. This is simply ruining a fantastic book.
Waste of time
1
By Irate999
The original is short enough that a remastering is not needed. The original is a great story and doesn't need to be "updated" to suit a newer audience. Read the original, don't waste your time with the remastering.
Study in scarlet
4
By Tmarkn
I enjoyed this version of the story
Wow so goodπππ
5
By Supersports88
This is an amazing book lots of detail and it all makes sense ππππ
Disrespectful to its author and readers
1
By Mr. Silvers
This "remastered" edition employs shameless censorship and needless modification. Avoid it and all the rest by Leo Zanaf. It is an insult to literature. Sir Arthur Conan Doyle is a talented writer nonetheless, and his story was still good underneath.